The digital asset space is evolving quickly, and since we launched the Purpose Solana ETF, we’ve been getting more and more questions about the difference between major blockchain platforms. Ethereum remains the most widely adopted smart contract platform, but Solana has emerged as a strong alternative — offering greater speed, lower costs, and higher staking yields. But it’s not really about which investment is better — it’s about understanding what each blockchain is optimized for, and how that fits into your strategy.
Rather than viewing Solana and Ethereum as direct competitors, it’s more useful to understand them as complementary technologies — each with distinct design goals and risk/reward profiles. For investors looking to build a diversified crypto allocation, that distinction matters.
Let’s break it down in plain English.
Key Takeaways
- Speed: Solana is way faster than Ethereum. We're talking thousands of transactions per second (TPS) vs Ethereum's 15–30 TPS on the base layer.
- Transaction Costs: Solana’s low fees (often fractions of a cent) make it well-suited for decentralized finance (DeFi) applications that require speed and scale. Ethereum fees remain higher, though Layer-2 solutions are helping.
- Staking Yield: Solana currently offers higher staking yields (currently around 8.0% APY) compared with Ethereum (currently around 3.5% APY), which may appeal to income-oriented investors.
- Ecosystem: Ethereum has the edge in DeFi and developer activity, but Solana is gaining traction in consumer apps, NFTs, and speed-critical use cases.
- Portfolio Fit: For clients seeking diversified exposure to blockchain infrastructure, both Ethereum and Solana have roles to play — with Solana offering differentiated performance characteristics.
Why Solana Feels Fast (Because It Is)
Solana uses a unique mechanism called Proof of History that lets it process transactions in parallel. That means less waiting, faster finality (under a second), and an experience that actually feels like using a normal app.
Compare that to Ethereum’s base layer, which is secure and decentralized, but slow and congested. Layer 2s help a lot — but they add complexity, bridging risk, and fragmented liquidity.
On Solana, you get speed and scale on the base layer. That’s a big deal.
Staking: More Yield, Fewer Headaches
One of Solana’s underrated strengths is its staking yield. Staking is how blockchains like Solana stay secure. Instead of relying on energy-intensive mining (like Bitcoin), Solana validators lock up tokens (i.e., "stakes" them) to help validate transactions. In return, those who stake their tokens earn rewards — similar to how you might earn interest on a bond or dividend from a stock.
Ethereum also uses staking, but in comparison to Solana, yields are generally lower and, on the backend, require more setup, especially if you want to avoid centralized providers or run your own validator.
The Purpose Solana ETF (SOLL) is designed to provide investors with an easy, safe way to earn rewards for holding digital assets. Purpose’s in-house validator infrastructure and deep involvement in the Solana community are designed to minimize friction and maximize investor yield to offer one of the most efficient Solana staking structures on the market.
Solana’s simplicity and targeted higher yields make it appealing to passive-income investors.
Ethereum Still Sets the Standard — But Solana Offers a Different Angle
Ethereum remains the most established smart contract platform in the market. It has the longest track record, the largest developer ecosystem, and continues to anchor much of the DeFi landscape. From institutional-grade custody solutions to blue-chip DeFi protocols, Ethereum has become the de facto base layer for many serious market participants.
That said, Solana offers a distinct and complementary value proposition — emphasizing performance, user experience, and ease of use. For advisors and investors evaluating blockchain exposure, the question isn’t whether Solana will “replace” Ethereum, but how both networks can play different roles in a diversified digital asset strategy.
The Bottom Line
Solana isn’t trying to “flip” Ethereum — it’s offering something different: a fast, low-cost chain that delivers real-time UX and higher staking rewards. For users who care about simplicity, speed, and yield, Solana is an increasingly strong option.
If you’re building a diversified crypto portfolio, it makes sense to look at both. ETH remains the bedrock of DeFi. SOL is a high-performance chain with real traction — and yield to match.
As always, do your own research. But don’t sleep on Solana.
Want to go deeper? Reading our Solana and Ethereum whitepapers is a good next step. We’re also happy to break down staking strategies, validator selection, or how to balance SOL and ETH exposure in a real portfolio — just say the word.
The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this information, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. The information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses may all be associated with investment fund investments. Please read the prospectus and other disclosure documents before investing. There can be no assurance that the full amount of your investment in a fund will be returned to you. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Crypto assets can be extremely volatile and there is no guarantee that the amount invested will be returned to you. Fund distribution levels and frequencies are not guaranteed and may vary at the sole discretion of Purpose.
Certain statements in this document may be forward-looking. Forward-looking statements ("FLS") are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as "may,” "will,” "should,” "could,” "expect,” "anticipate,” "intend,” "plan,” "believe,” "estimate" or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments believes to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.